How the Government Outsourced Intelligence to Silicon Valley

How the Government Outsourced Intelligence to Silicon Valley

Wed, 3/4/2015 – by Robert Scheer
This article originally appeared on Truthdig

The following is an excerpt from “They Know Everything About You: How Data-Collecting Corporations and Snooping Government Agencies Are Destroying Democracy,” published last month by Nation Books.

For years, the outsourcing of defense and intelligence work was, with good reason, controversial in political circles. But in the last years of Bill Clinton’s administration, the president authorized the CIA’s creation of the first US government–sponsored venture capital firm, In-Q-Tel, designed to invest in cutting-edge Silicon Valley companies. The firm, named after Ian Fleming’s fictional character “Q,” who masterminds James Bond’s spy gadgets, was founded on September 29, 1999, when the intelligence agencies came to realize they couldn’t produce the technology required to make sense of the vast amount of data they had acquired.

The firm’s mission is to “identify, adapt, and deliver innovative technology solutions to support the missions of the Central Intelligence Agency and broader US community.” This process provided a way of tapping the resources and creativity of Silicon Valley—which undoubtedly had gained a technological edge over government in the post–Cold War period—without the burden of trying to directly recruit the free spirits of Palo Alto into government bureaucracy.

Under the guise of In-Q-Tel, the CIA has invested in hundreds of start-ups, including a company called Keyhole, whose satellite mapping software became Google Earth. In-Q-Tel proved immensely successful in its first five years, bringing revenue into the agency and, more significantly, allowing it to discreetly co-opt technologies and companies that would exponentially enhance its spying capabilities without causing the public to ever raise an eyebrow.

The practice of tapping tech companies for government work, then, began to shed its taboo and appear increasingly attractive to other governmental entities. For example, NASA and the US Army, inspired by the success of In-Q-Tel, are currently planning to develop their own venture capital firms in its image. Thanks in part to In-Q-Tel, the already substantial for-profit investment in the intelligence area was expanded significantly under President George W. Bush, such that it constituted about 70 percent of the intelligence budget by 2007.

This was just the ticket for former National Security Adviser Admiral John Poindexter to ride when Congress terminated his pet program, Total Information Awareness, in 2003. The program’s aim was to “revolutionize the ability of the United States to detect, classify, and identify foreign terrorists—and decipher their plans—and thereby enable the U.S. to take timely action to successfully preempt and defeat terrorist acts.” Poindexter was stymied in his efforts by a Congress concerned about big government’s threat to privacy.

In this burgeoning market of government/tech synergy—the core of the military-intelligence complex—for-profit corporations play a deceptively important role in disguising the extent of government spying on its own people. As is the case with the government’s seizure and exploitation of the massive data collected by Google, Facebook, and other Internet companies, there is an illusion that this information is simply an enhancement for shoppers and social networkers, rather than the means by which our government keeps tabs on all of our activities—from the political to the most personal.

For that reason, when Poindexter’s program was nixed by Congress, it was a natural fit to turn to a private, clearly for-profit Silicon Valley start-up called Palantir, in part with CIA funding. Palantir is the premier company for unraveling and interpreting dense tangles of information—data sets—for intelligence and law enforcement agencies. It offers software that, in the company’s own words, “connects data, technologies, humans and environments” and, as a bonus, a staff that pays house calls to clients’ offices to customize its programs.

But, as the ACLU notes,

“We don’t know the degree of entanglement between the company and the agencies in terms of how the software is operated. And depending on the details of how it’s used, its deployment could be anything between a good, efficient use of government resources, and a true totalitarian nightmare, monitoring the activities of innocent Americans on a mass scale, collecting the records of those activities and leaving them open for suspicionless exploration by government analysts. Unfortunately, everything we know suggests that it is likely close to the latter.”

Palantir, entrusted to mine that massive trove of personal data on behalf of both local and federal governments, was Poindexter’s Total Information Awareness program renamed and repackaged. Sure enough, it would blossom without him, a testament to his doing more than anyone to make the nightmare of a Big Brother government that knows the desires, fears and habits of each and every soul a frightening reality.

Palantir’s work for the spy agencies is highly classified, and the company has a very active public relations operation aimed at creating a benign impression of its intentions and stressing its non-spy activity, which includes data integration of investment bank knowledge bases as well as “philanthropy engineering.” According to the company, this engineering involves working on “creating slavery-free supply chains, addressing small-plot farmer food security, improving global health and fighting disease outbreaks, providing humanitarian relief in the wake of natural disasters, and more.” But it is clear that the company, from its inception, had made its primary function the designing of surveillance programs for the spy agencies. In fact, Palantir would not have managed to stay in existence were it not for a multimillion-dollar investment and substantial technical support provided by the CIA.

When the CIA and NSA first approached Palantir with funds and support in 2004, the Palo Alto–based “computer software and services company” was a fledgling start-up. Since then, as a contractor for top intelligence agencies—as well as some major private banks, like JPMorgan Chase, and multinational corporations—Palantir is valued at $9 billion and has become the most successful among the numerous CIA-backed data analyzation companies.

Peter Thiel, whose PayPal investment had left him a billionaire, founded Palantir. He was convinced that the tactics that had allowed PayPal to predict credit card fraud would work in identifying terrorists. Other investors, however, were not as convinced, and by 2005, a year after Palantir was incorporated, the company was without a single customer or investor other than Thiel.

Palantir was rescued by a referral to In-Q-Tel. It was that fortuitous contact that resulted in a $2 million CIA investment and the subsequent success of Palantir. But far more important than the CIA’s injection of financial capital was its support—access to the CIA’s secret databases, in-house technical experts, and a rolodex of prospective clients on the Hill. These would give Palantir the lift it needed over the next three years.

Alex Karp, Palantir’s CEO—a hipster exec who obtained his PhD in philosophy at the University of Frankfurt (earned, he might remind us, under the mentorship of the eminent philosopher Jürgen Habermas) and a JD at Stanford Law School—is possessed of “progressive” politics and software engineering ignorance. This eclectic persona is enormously useful to Palantir, which effectively plays the role formerly assigned to the Total Information Awareness program: a monstrous government snoop, mining our most intimate data.

This point was obviously not lost on Poindexter—seemingly the complete antithesis of Karp in terms of personal style and political outlook—as he was casting about to keep his program alive after Congress shut it down.

Palantir has a carefully honed image as a sort of countercultural spy outfit committed to privacy and individual rights in the pursuit of national security. The company’s home page and other marketing devices reek of a virtuous win-win alternative, speaking to the concern imbedded in the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution that spying on the citizenry is an intrinsically doubtful proposition in a free society and needs to be carefully regulated. Paying homage to that notion, Palantir makes much of its built-in “audit trail,” which presumably prevents unauthorized use of private data by individuals working within a government agency. The company plays up the supposed virtues of this mechanism in the “privacy and civil liberties” section of its official website:

“Palantir’s immutable and real-time audit logging technologies help ensure compliance with applicable policies designed to protect privacy and civil liberties. Palantir’s audit logs can be configured to capture the information a particular customer requires in order to identify behavior that might indicate misuse of data. Audit logs can record everything from login attempts to specific user search queries to user views of individual records. . . . Using Palantir, an investigator is able to quickly sift through large amounts of auditing data, identifying suspicious activity, and drill down to that activity to determine whether there may have been a violation of law or policy.”

But the grievous problem with this formula is obvious on two counts. One is that using the audit trail to monitor a government agency’s or private corporation’s spying activity is totally self-enforcing. If a company decides to be indifferent to that trail, the Palantir system continues to mine the data just fine. However, a more serious concern is that it may not be an aberrant individual employee who is using the software to monitor a private citizen’s activities but, in fact, the organization itself.

This is of course routinely true of the NSA, FBI, and CIA, as we have learned through the years from the revelations by whistleblowers of unauthorized spying activities. It is far more likely that the Palantir-designed audit trail will be used to identify not agency-approved practices that violate the law but, rather, that rare whistleblower within the organization who dares to tell the truth about such illegal practices.

So there you have it. So-called private companies that either are directly funded by the US government or profit from US government contracts move to destroy organizations and individuals who dare to expose the reach of government and corporate power—a classic manifestation of the government’s threat to our constitutionally protected freedoms. But because for-profit private companies are used as proxies to engage in such nefarious behavior, the government threat to freedom goes largely unnoticed. Hence the prowess and danger of the military-intelligence complex.

Originally published by Truthdig

In-Q-Tel, intelligence outsourcing, Total Information Awareness, Palantir, Peter Thiel, surveillance programs, military-intelligence complex

Posted in Companies, Intelligence, Outsourcing/Privatization | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Management System for Quality of Private Security Company Operations – Requirements with Guidance

Management System for Quality of Private Security Company Operations – Requirements with Guidance

ASIS Commission on Standards and Guidelines
ASIS International
Item #:

Continue reading

Posted in Control | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Modern Mercenary: Private Armies and What They Mean for World Order

March 3, 2015

On March 3, the Atlantic Council’s Africa Center hosted an event to mark the release of Senior Fellow Sean McFate’s book, The Modern Mercenary: Private Armies and What They Mean for World Order. Continue reading

Posted in Academic | Tagged | Leave a comment

Two Serco staff suspended over undercover Yarl’s Wood film

Tuesday 03 March 2015 UK

Two Serco staff suspended over undercover Yarl’s Wood film

Serco suspends two staff members from the Yarl’s Wood immigration detention centre after staff were filmed in an undercover Channel 4 News film on the treatment of detainees.

Security outsourcing company Serco has suspended two members of staff over revelations made by a Channel 4 News undercover film into the treatment of people kept at the Yarl’s Wood immigration detention centre. Continue reading

Posted in Companies, Control, UK | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Modern Mercenaries: Unaccountable Opportunists or Tools for the Public Good?

Posted in Academic, Outsourcing/Privatization | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Private Police: Mercenaries For The American Police State

Private Police: Mercenaries For The American Police State

Talk about a diabolical end run around the Constitution.

Corporate America is using police forces as their mercenaries.”—Ray Lewis, Retired Philadelphia Police Captain

It’s one thing to know and exercise your rights when a police officer pulls you over; but what rights do you have when a private cop—entrusted with all of the powers of a government cop but not held to the same legal standards—pulls you over and subjects you to a stop-and-frisk or, worse, causes you to “disappear” into a Gitmo-esque detention center not unlike the one employed by Chicago police at Homan Square?

For that matter, how do you even begin to know who you’re dealing with, given that these private cops often wear police uniforms, carry police-grade weapons, and perform many of the same duties as public cops, including carrying out SWAT team raids, issuing tickets, and firing their weapons? Continue reading

Posted in Outsourcing/Privatization | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Perils of Privatization

The Perils of Privatization

This article appears as part of a special report, “What the Free Market Can’t Do,” in the Winter 2015 issue of  The American Prospect magazine. 

One November morning in 2004, three U.S. military men boarded a small turboprop plane at Bagram Air Base near Kabul for a two-and-a-half-hour flight to Farah, a base in western Afghanistan. They were Lieutenant Colonel Michael McMahon, Chief Warrant Officer Travis Grogan, and Specialist Harley Miller, the only passengers on Flight 61. The flight was operated by an affiliate of Blackwater, the private military company under U.S. contract for air transport of mail, supplies, and troops.

Forty minutes after takeoff, flying far north of the customary route from Bagram to Farah, the plane crashed into the side of a mountain. McMahon, Grogan, the pilot, co-pilot, and the mechanic apparently died instantly. At the time, McMahon was the highest-ranking U.S. soldier to die in the war. Miller, though he suffered internal injuries, may have lived for as long as ten hours after the crash, but the route was so obscure that rescuers could not locate the wreckage in time to save him. Continue reading

Posted in Outsourcing/Privatization | Tagged | Leave a comment

The 25 licensed private overseas recruitment companies in Uganda

By Darious Magara & Jacky Achan

KAMPALA – The Ugandan ministry of gender, labour and social development has released a list (at bottom of page) of only 25 licensed private overseas recruitment companies in Uganda.

The companies complied with the requirements of externalization of labour, most of which is to countries in the Middle East, according to the state minister for labour Mwesigwa Rukutana.

Rukutana recently said government is now trying to streamline the overseas labour recruitment exercise to ensure Ugandans employed abroad are treated fairly.

Continue reading

Posted in Africa, Companies, Control | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

46,000 Ugandans recruited to work abroad

Close to 46,000 Ugandans have benefited from the programme of externalisation of labour, MPs have heard.

Labour State minister Rukutana Mwesigwa

The Principal Labour Officer (Research and Statistics) in the Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development, Milton Turyasiima was meeting a team from Uganda Women Parliamentary Association.

MPs namely Mary Marion Tuunde (workers), Mariam Nalubega (Butambala), Olivia Kwagala (Iganga) and Grace Namara (Lyantonde) had gone to the Ministry on Monday to track implementation of the Prevention of Trafficking in Persons Act, 2009.

Turyasiima explained that the programme was initiated by the government in 2005 to reduce on the unemployment pressure in the country. “Since the first deployment in 2006 close to 46,000 people have benefited from the programme,” he said.

The destinations for migrant workers, he said, include Somalia, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Afaghanistan.
He revealed that the migrant workers remit about US$2m to Uganda every year. Continue reading

Posted in Africa, Companies, Control, Fraud/Waste/Abuse | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

African Skies sub-contracts for US security firms

A Ugandan firm run by a group of South Africans has become a key player in refitting base camps situated in difficult zones.

The company African Skies Ltd is on a roll in Uganda. In addition, it has been short-listed by the European Union (EU) to build and secure the compound for the future Eucap Nestor mission in Somalia (see the report by Intelligence Online, Indigo Publications). It submitted its proposal in partnership with the American firm Bancroft which already operates a secured camp in Mogadishu.

Continue reading

Posted in Africa, Companies, South Africa | Tagged , , | Leave a comment
32 visitors online now
14 guests, 17 bots, 1 members
Max visitors today: 44 at 03:53 am UTC
This month: 71 at 03-03-2015 09:28 pm UTC
This year: 100 at 01-23-2015 12:15 pm UTC
All time: 376 at 03-21-2014 07:44 am UTC